Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

InLine 11109A interface cards/adapter vs InLine 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2

6specifications compared
5differ
1identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2 has 218 mm more width than the InLine 11109A interface cards/adapter (236 mm vs 18 mm). The InLine 11109A interface cards/adapter has 35 mm more depth than the InLine 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2 (122 mm vs 87 mm). The InLine 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2 has 41 g more package weight than the InLine 11109A interface cards/adapter (69 g vs 28 g). Package type: Polybag on the InLine 11109A interface cards/adapter, Box on the InLine 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2.

Width
- 11109A interface cards/adapter:18 mm
- 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2:236 mm
Depth
- 11109A interface cards/adapter:122 mm
- 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2:87 mm
Package weight
- 11109A interface cards/adapter:28 g
- 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2:69 g
Package type
- 11109A interface cards/adapter:Polybag
- 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2:Box

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 11109A, 76660O
32 specifications	A InLine 11109A interface cards/adapter Model 11109A View product	B InLine 76660O interface cards/adapter Internal U.2 Model 76660O View product
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PCIe
Output interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	U.2
Host interface genderKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Male
Expansion card standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PCIe 3.0
NVMeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Designidentical
InternalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Country of origin	Taiwan	Taiwan
Product colourKnown for one	Stainless steel	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PI6C20400BLE
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 Gbit/s
BandwidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	64 Gbit/s
Poweridentical
Power supply input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.3 V
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 85 °C
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Server operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows Server 2012 R2
Technical details1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffers	RoHS, TÜV mark	TÜV mark, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	18 mm	236 mm
DepthDiffers	122 mm	87 mm
HeightKnown for one	13 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	25 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data2 differ
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Package weightDiffers	28 g	69 g
Package typeDiffers	Polybag	Box
Quantity per packKnown for one	2 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	165 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	15 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package volumeKnown for one	300 cm³	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	18 x 122 x 13 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
TypeKnown for one	GPU bracket	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons