Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

iggual IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth vs Lenovo 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort

5specifications compared
4differ
1identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface: USB Type-A on the iggual IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth, BTB on the Lenovo 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort. Output interface: Bluetooth on the iggual IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth, DisplayPort on the Lenovo 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort. Product colour: Black on the iggual IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth, Green on the Lenovo 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort. Windows operating systems supported: Yes on the iggual IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth, Windows 11 on the Lenovo 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort.

Host interface
- IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth:USB Type-A
- 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort:BTB
Output interface
- IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth:Bluetooth
- 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort:DisplayPort
Product colour
- IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth:Black
- 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort:Green
Windows operating systems supported
- IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth:Yes
- 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort:Windows 11

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of IGG319383, 4XH1U89937
27 specifications	A iggual IGG319383 interface cards/adapter Internal Bluetooth Model IGG319383 View product	B Lenovo 4XH1U89937 interface cards/adapter Internal DisplayPort Model 4XH1U89937 View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	USB Type-A	BTB
Output interfaceDiffers	Bluetooth	DisplayPort
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	5.3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Internal	Yes	Yes
Product colourDiffers	Black	Green
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC, CE, CB, RoHS, UKCA, RCM
Easy to installKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 90%
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Yes	Windows 11
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	39.5 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14.1 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	135 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	130 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	35 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	70 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Other featuresidentical
CompatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ThinkCentre Tiny M IO Expansion Box
Frequency rangeKnown for one	2.4 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Connector 1 genderKnown for one	Male	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 1 form factorKnown for one	Straight	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one	0.003 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless rangeKnown for one	20 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons