Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

ICY BOX IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS vs j5create JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

8specifications compared
8differ
0identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface
- IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:PCIe
- JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):USB Type-C
Output interface
- IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:Mini-SAS
- JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Internal
- IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:Yes
- JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):No
Product colour
- IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:Green
- JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):White
Width
- IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:80 mm
- JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):50 mm
Depth
- IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:60 mm
- JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):10 mm
Height
- IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:15 mm
- JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):30 mm
Weight
- IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:23 g
- JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):11 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of IB-PCI211, JCH349
27 specifications	A ICY BOX IB-PCI211 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS Model IB-PCI211 View product	B j5create JCH349 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Model JCH349 View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	PCIe	USB Type-C
Output interfaceDiffers	Mini-SAS	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Expansion card form factorKnown for one	Full-height	Unknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card standardKnown for one	PCIe 3.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Internal mini-SAS portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Design2 differ
InternalDiffers	Yes	No
Product colourDiffers	Green	White
Country of originKnown for one	China	Unknown — not stated by the source
PurposeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Laptop
Featuresidentical
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one	12 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
BandwidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 Gbit/s
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 10, Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64,	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	80 mm	50 mm
DepthDiffers	60 mm	10 mm
HeightDiffers	15 mm	30 mm
WeightDiffers	23 g	11 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	135 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	25 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	88 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quick installation guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Logistics dataidentical
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	50 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	4 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
MaterialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons