Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2 vs HP VGA Port Flex IO v2

11specifications compared
5differ
6identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

The HP VGA Port Flex IO v2 has 0.2 mm more width than the HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2 (41.8 mm vs 41.6 mm). The HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2 has 0.7 mm more depth than the HP VGA Port Flex IO v2 (39.7 mm vs 39 mm). The HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2 has 0.2 mm more height than the HP VGA Port Flex IO v2 (16.7 mm vs 16.5 mm). Output interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) on the HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2, VGA on the HP VGA Port Flex IO v2.

Output interface
- Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2)
- VGA Port Flex IO v2:VGA
Width
- Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:41.6 mm
- VGA Port Flex IO v2:41.8 mm
Depth
- Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:39.7 mm
- VGA Port Flex IO v2:39 mm
Height
- Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:16.7 mm
- VGA Port Flex IO v2:16.5 mm
Weight
- Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:10 g
- VGA Port Flex IO v2:11.5 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2, VGA Port Flex IO v2
12 specifications	A HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2 View product	B HP VGA Port Flex IO v2 View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Output interfaceDiffers	USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2)	VGA
Technical detailsidentical
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	41.6 mm	41.8 mm
DepthDiffers	39.7 mm	39 mm
HeightDiffers	16.7 mm	16.5 mm
WeightDiffers	10 g	11.5 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons