Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

HP 5G WWAN vs Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 1identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 300.9 mm more width than the HP 5G WWAN (353 mm vs 52.1 mm). The Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 95.2 mm more depth than the HP 5G WWAN (125.2 mm vs 30 mm). The Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 19.51 mm more height than the HP 5G WWAN (21.8 mm vs 2.29 mm). Operating temperature (T-T): -15 - 55 °C on the HP 5G WWAN, 10 - 35 °C on the Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2. Weight: 9.07 g on the HP 5G WWAN, 1.8 kg on the Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2.

  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • 5G WWAN:-15 - 55 °C
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:10 - 35 °C
  • Width
    • 5G WWAN:52.1 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:353 mm
  • Depth
    • 5G WWAN:30 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:125.2 mm
  • Height
    • 5G WWAN:2.29 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:21.8 mm
  • Weight
    • 5G WWAN:9.07 g
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:1.8 kg
  • Package width
    • 5G WWAN:231.9 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:500 mm
  • Package depth
    • 5G WWAN:148.1 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:190 mm
  • Package height
    • 5G WWAN:9.91 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:75 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 5G WWAN, 4XH1S82999
27 specifications
Designidentical
Country of originKnown for oneVietnam, TaiwanUnknown — not stated by the source
InternalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE EMC EU DoC FCC RCM DoC BSMI UK DoC VCCI KCC CB ECAC RoHS Morocco DoC
Featuresidentical
HP segmentKnown for oneBusinessUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-15 - 55 °C10 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 80%
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedWindows 11Windows 11
Technical detailsidentical
General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) URLKnown for onehttps://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_6126692-6126777-16?openCLC=trueUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for one20 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for onePaper-based packaging; At least 30% post-consumer recycled plasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers52.1 mm353 mm
DepthDiffers30 mm125.2 mm
HeightDiffers2.29 mm21.8 mm
WeightDiffers9.07 g1.8 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers231.9 mm500 mm
Package depthDiffers148.1 mm190 mm
Package heightDiffers9.91 mm75 mm
Package weightDiffers58.97 g2.37 kg
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross weightKnown for one139.8 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) cases per palletKnown for one100 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 11Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet weight (imperial)Known for one139.8 kg (308.2 lbs)Unknown — not stated by the source
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one43201409Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePCIe
Output interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceM.2

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons