All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

HP 5G WWAN vs InLine 51125P interface cards/adapter Internal

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 0identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine 51125P interface cards/adapter Internal has 107.9 mm more width than the HP 5G WWAN (160 mm vs 52.1 mm). The InLine 51125P interface cards/adapter Internal has 39 mm more depth than the HP 5G WWAN (69 mm vs 30 mm). The InLine 51125P interface cards/adapter Internal has 191.03 g more package weight than the HP 5G WWAN (250 g vs 58.97 g). Country of origin: Vietnam, Taiwan on the HP 5G WWAN, Taiwan on the InLine 51125P interface cards/adapter Internal. Operating temperature (T-T): -15 - 55 °C on the HP 5G WWAN, 0 - 55 °C on the InLine 51125P interface cards/adapter Internal.

  • Country of origin
    • Vietnam, Taiwan
    • Taiwan
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • -15 - 55 °C
    • 0 - 55 °C
  • Width
    • 52.1 mm
    • 160 mm
  • Depth
    • 30 mm
    • 69 mm
  • Package weight
    • 58.97 g
    • 250 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
38 specifications
A

HP

5G WWANView product
B

InLine

51125P interface cards/adapter Internal

Model 51125P

View product
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceKnown for onePCI Express
Design1 differ
InternalKnown for oneYes
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes
Country of originDiffersVietnam, TaiwanTaiwan
Featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for oneIntel NHI350AM2
Full duplexKnown for oneYes
HP segmentKnown for oneBusiness
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-15 - 55 °C0 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 90%
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 11Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneKernel 2.6.31, Kernel 2.6.33, Kernel 3.12, Kernel 3.17, Kernel 3.3, Kernel 4.6.4
Server operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneFreeBSD
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, TÜV mark
General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) URLKnown for onehttps://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_6126692-6126777-16?openCLC=true
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for one20 pc(s)
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for onePaper-based packaging; At least 30% post-consumer recycled plastic
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers52.1 mm160 mm
DepthDiffers30 mm69 mm
HeightKnown for one2.29 mm
WeightKnown for one9.07 g
Packaging data1 differ
Mounting brackets includedKnown for oneYes
ManualKnown for oneYes
Package weightDiffers58.97 g250 g
Package volumeKnown for one700 cm³
Package widthKnown for one231.9 mm
Package depthKnown for one148.1 mm
Package heightKnown for one9.91 mm
Other featuresidentical
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWired
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one2
InterfaceKnown for oneEthernet
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 1588, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1Qav, IEEE 802.1as, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ae, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 11
Pallet weight (imperial)Known for one139.8 kg (308.2 lbs)
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one43201409
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross weightKnown for one139.8 kg
Master (outer) cases per palletKnown for one100 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons