Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

HP 3PAR StoreServ 7000 2-port 10Gb/sec iSCSI/FCoE Adapter vs Lenovo 4XH0F46091 interface cards/adapter Internal SAS, SATA

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

  • Host interface
    • 3PAR StoreServ 7000 2-port 10Gb/sec iSCSI/FCoE Adapter:PCIe
    • 4XH0F46091 interface cards/adapter Internal SAS, SATA:SATA
  • Output interface
    • 3PAR StoreServ 7000 2-port 10Gb/sec iSCSI/FCoE Adapter:Fiber
    • 4XH0F46091 interface cards/adapter Internal SAS, SATA:SAS, SATA
  • Width
    • 3PAR StoreServ 7000 2-port 10Gb/sec iSCSI/FCoE Adapter:215.9 mm
    • 4XH0F46091 interface cards/adapter Internal SAS, SATA:15 mm
  • Depth
    • 3PAR StoreServ 7000 2-port 10Gb/sec iSCSI/FCoE Adapter:101.6 mm
    • 4XH0F46091 interface cards/adapter Internal SAS, SATA:30 mm
  • Weight
    • 3PAR StoreServ 7000 2-port 10Gb/sec iSCSI/FCoE Adapter:450 g
    • 4XH0F46091 interface cards/adapter Internal SAS, SATA:1.8 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 3PAR StoreServ 7000 2-port 10Gb/sec iSCSI/FCoE Adapter, 4XH0F46091
11 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersPCIeSATA
Output interfaceDiffersFiberSAS, SATA
Fiber optic connectorKnown for oneSFPUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one10 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers215.9 mm15 mm
DepthDiffers101.6 mm30 mm
HeightKnown for one254 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers450 g1.8 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons