Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter vs Nilox 4-Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card

7specifications compared
5differ
2identical
7known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:USB
- 4-Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card:ExpressCard
Width
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:23 mm
- 4-Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card:115 mm
Depth
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:12 mm
- 4-Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card:80 mm
Height
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:2 mm
- 4-Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card:18 mm
Connectivity technology
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:Wireless
- 4-Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card:Wired

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter, 4-Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card
14 specifications	A Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter View product	B Nilox 4-Port USB 2.0 PCMCIA Card View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	USB	ExpressCard
Output interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB 2.0
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	23 mm	115 mm
DepthDiffers	12 mm	80 mm
HeightDiffers	2 mm	18 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 g
Other features1 differ
Ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wireless	Wired
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	40 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons