Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter vs Nilox 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card

Key differences

Host interface
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:USB
- 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card:PCIe
Width
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:23 mm
- 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card:115 mm
Depth
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:12 mm
- 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card:80 mm
Height
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:2 mm
- 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card:18 mm
Data transfer rate
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:480 Mbit/s
- 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card:400 Mbit/s
Connectivity technology
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:Wireless
- 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card:Wired

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter, 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card
13 specifications	A Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter View product	B Nilox 4-Port FireWire PCI-E Card View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	USB	PCIe
Firewire (IEEE 1394) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Blue
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	23 mm	115 mm
DepthDiffers	12 mm	80 mm
HeightDiffers	2 mm	18 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 g
Other features2 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	480 Mbit/s	400 Mbit/s
Ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wireless	Wired
Mac compatibility	No	No
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	40 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.