Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter vs Nilox 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card

Key differences

Host interface
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:USB
- 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card:PCIe
Width
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:23 mm
- 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card:80 mm
Depth
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:12 mm
- 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card:80 mm
Height
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:2 mm
- 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card:18 mm
Data transfer rate
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:480 Mbit/s
- 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card:5000 Mbit/s
Connectivity technology
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:Wireless
- 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card:Wired

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter, 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card
14 specifications	A Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter View product	B Nilox 3-Port USB 3.0 PCI-E Card View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	USB	PCIe
Output interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Green
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	23 mm	80 mm
DepthDiffers	12 mm	80 mm
HeightDiffers	2 mm	18 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 g
Other features2 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	480 Mbit/s	5000 Mbit/s
Ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wireless	Wired
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	40 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.