Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter vs Hama USB 3.0 ExpressCard

4specifications compared
3differ
1identical
7known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:USB
- USB 3.0 ExpressCard:ExpressCard
Data transfer rate
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:480 Mbit/s
- USB 3.0 ExpressCard:5000 Mbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter, USB 3.0 ExpressCard
11 specifications	A Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter View product	B Hama USB 3.0 ExpressCard View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	USB	ExpressCard
Output interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	23 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	12 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	2 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	480 Mbit/s	5000 Mbit/s
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	40 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wireless	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7	Windows XP/Vista/Vista x64/7/ 7x64
Mac compatibility	No	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons