Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter vs Hama USB 3.0 Controller, PCIe

5specifications compared
4differ
1identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:USB
- USB 3.0 Controller, PCIe:PCIe
Data transfer rate
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:480 Mbit/s
- USB 3.0 Controller, PCIe:5000 Mbit/s
Connectivity technology
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:Wireless
- USB 3.0 Controller, PCIe:Wired

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter, USB 3.0 Controller, PCIe
15 specifications	A Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter View product	B Hama USB 3.0 Controller, PCIe View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	USB	PCIe
Output interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	225 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	170 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	225 g
Other features3 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	480 Mbit/s	5000 Mbit/s
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wireless	Wired
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7	Win XP/Vista/7 (32/64 bit Vista / 7)
Mac compatibility	No	No
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	40 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	23 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	12 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	2 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons