Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Hama 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B vs LogiLink AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 5identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The LogiLink AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA has 4.52 Gbit/s more data transfer rate (max) than the Hama 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B (5 Gbit/s vs 0.48 Gbit/s). Output interface: Micro-USB B on the Hama 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B, SATA on the LogiLink AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA. Host interface gender: Female on the Hama 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B, Male on the LogiLink AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA. Connector 1 gender: Female on the Hama 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B, Male on the LogiLink AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA. Connector 2 form factor: Straight on the Hama 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B, Angled on the LogiLink AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA.

  • Output interface
    • 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B:Micro-USB B
    • AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA:SATA
  • Host interface gender
    • 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B:Female
    • AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA:Male
  • Connector 1 gender
    • 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B:Female
    • AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA:Male
  • Connector 2 form factor
    • 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B:Straight
    • AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA:Angled
  • Data transfer rate (max)
    • 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B:0.48 Gbit/s
    • AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA:5 Gbit/s
  • Quantity per pack
    • 00201744 interface cards/adapter Micro-USB B:3 pc(s)
    • AU0062 interface cards/adapter SATA:1 pc(s)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00201744, AU0062
32 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Output interfaceDiffersMicro-USB BSATA
Host interface genderDiffersFemaleMale
SATA revisionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.0
Designidentical
Maximum cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.2 m
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Hot-Plug supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to installKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Features3 differ
Connector 1 genderDiffersFemaleMale
Connector 2 form factorDiffersStraightAngled
Data transfer rate (max)Differs0.48 Gbit/s5 Gbit/s
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 85 °C
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid, ChromeOS
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source65 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 g
Packaging data1 differ
Quantity per packDiffers3 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for one195 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one90 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one15 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one30 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons