Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 vs TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 2identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 has 157 mm more package width than the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI (230 mm vs 73 mm). The TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI has 50 mm more package depth than the Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 (140 mm vs 90 mm). The Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 has 13 mm more package height than the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI (35 mm vs 22 mm). Output interface: RJ-45 on the Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45, HDMI on the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI. Windows operating systems supported: Windows 10, Windows 11 on the Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45, Yes on the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI.

  • Output interface
    • 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:RJ-45
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:HDMI
  • Windows operating systems supported
    • 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:Windows 10, Windows 11
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:Yes
  • Package width
    • 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:230 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:73 mm
  • Package depth
    • 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:90 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:140 mm
  • Package height
    • 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:35 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:22 mm
  • Package weight
    • 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:63 g
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:60 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00200360, UA520C
24 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Output interfaceDiffersRJ-45HDMI
Host interface genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Connector 1 genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Connector 2 genderKnown for oneFemaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Connector 1 form factorKnown for oneStraightUnknown — not stated by the source
Connector 2 form factorKnown for oneStraightUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one2.5 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements2 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11Yes
Mac operating systems supportedDiffersMac OS X 11.0 Big Sur, Mac OS X 12.0 Monterey, Mac OS X 13.0 Ventura, Mac OS X 14.0 Sonoma, Mac OS X 15.0 SequoiaYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid, ChromeOS, iOS
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers230 mm73 mm
Package depthDiffers90 mm140 mm
Package heightDiffers35 mm22 mm
Package weightDiffers63 g60 g
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source497 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source225 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source105 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons