Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 vs Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe

8specifications compared
6differ
2identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 has 56 mm more package width than the Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe (230 mm vs 174 mm). The Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe has 41 mm more package depth than the Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 (131 mm vs 90 mm). The Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 has 1 mm more package height than the Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe (35 mm vs 34 mm). Only the Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe has internal. Output interface: RJ-45 on the Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45, Mini PCIe on the Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe.

Output interface
- 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:RJ-45
- MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:Mini PCIe
Internal
- 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:No
- MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:Yes
Package width
- 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:230 mm
- MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:174 mm
Package depth
- 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:90 mm
- MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:131 mm
Package height
- 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:35 mm
- MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:34 mm
Package weight
- 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45:63 g
- MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:110 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 00200360, MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L
25 specifications	A Hama 00200360 interface cards/adapter RJ-45 Model 00200360 View product	B Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe Model MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceKnown for one	USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output interfaceDiffers	RJ-45	Mini PCIe
Host interface genderKnown for one	Male	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
InternalDiffers	No	Yes
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE
Featuresidentical
Connector 1 genderKnown for one	Male	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 2 genderKnown for one	Female	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 1 form factorKnown for one	Straight	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector 2 form factorKnown for one	Straight	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one	2.5 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ChipsetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	WCH CH384L
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 10, Windows 11	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Mac OS X 11.0 Big Sur, Mac OS X 12.0 Monterey, Mac OS X 13.0 Ventura, Mac OS X 14.0 Sonoma, Mac OS X 15.0 Sequoia	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers	230 mm	174 mm
Package depthDiffers	90 mm	131 mm
Package heightDiffers	35 mm	34 mm
Package weightDiffers	63 g	110 g
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	174 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	131 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons