Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

GIGABYTE GC-MSLZ1 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS vs GIGABYTE RA201-A interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS

7specifications compared
3differ
4identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

Expansion card standard
- GC-MSLZ1 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:PCIe 2.0
- RA201-A interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:PCIe 3.0
Width
- GC-MSLZ1 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:98 mm
- RA201-A interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:68.9 mm
Depth
- GC-MSLZ1 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:76.8 mm
- RA201-A interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS:165 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GC-MSLZ1, RA201-A
12 specifications	A GIGABYTE GC-MSLZ1 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS Model GC-MSLZ1 View product	B GIGABYTE RA201-A interface cards/adapter Internal Mini-SAS Model RA201-A View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PCIe
Expansion card form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Low-profile
Expansion card standardDiffers	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Green, Silver
Featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for one	LSI SAS2208	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one	6 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	98 mm	68.9 mm
DepthDiffers	76.8 mm	165 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons