Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

GIGABYTE GA-USB 3.0 vs Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter

4specifications compared
3differ
1identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface
- GA-USB 3.0:PCIe
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:USB
Data transfer rate
- GA-USB 3.0:5000 Mbit/s
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:480 Mbit/s
Connectivity technology
- GA-USB 3.0:Wired
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter:Wireless

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GA-USB 3.0, Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter
12 specifications	A GIGABYTE GA-USB 3.0 View product	B Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	PCIe	USB
Output interfaceKnown for one	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	23 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 mm
Other features2 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	5000 Mbit/s	480 Mbit/s
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 m
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wired	Wireless
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7
Mac compatibility	No	No
Ports quantityKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons