GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 vs TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN)

Key differences

The GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 133.2 mm more width than the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN) (150 mm vs 16.8 mm). The GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 26.9 mm more depth than the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN) (68.9 mm vs 42 mm). Only the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has internal. Host interface: PCIe on the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, USB Type-A on the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN). Output interface: M.2 on the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, Bluetooth on the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN).

• Host interface
  • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:PCIe
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):USB Type-A
• Output interface
  • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:M.2
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):Bluetooth
• Internal
  • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:Yes
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):No
• Product colour
  • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:Blue
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):Black
• Purpose
  • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:Server
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):PC / Notebook / Tablet
• Width
  • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:150 mm
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):16.8 mm
• Depth
  • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:68.9 mm
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):42 mm