Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 vs TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 0identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI has 347 mm more width than the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 (497 mm vs 150 mm). The TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI has 156.1 mm more depth than the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 (225 mm vs 68.9 mm). Only the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has internal. Host interface: PCIe on the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, USB Type-C on the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI. Output interface: M.2 on the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, HDMI on the TP-Link UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI.

  • Host interface
    • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:PCIe
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:USB Type-C
  • Output interface
    • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:M.2
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:HDMI
  • Internal
    • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:Yes
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:No
  • Width
    • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:150 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:497 mm
  • Depth
    • CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:68.9 mm
    • UA520C interface cards/adapter HDMI:225 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CMT40A0, UA520C
23 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersPCIeUSB Type-C
Output interfaceDiffersM.2HDMI
Host interface genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card form factorKnown for oneLow-profileUnknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card standardKnown for onePCIe 5.0Unknown — not stated by the source
NVMeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of M.2 (M) slotsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
InternalDiffersYesNo
Product colourKnown for oneBlueUnknown — not stated by the source
PurposeKnown for oneServerUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling typeKnown for onePassiveUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers150 mm497 mm
DepthDiffers68.9 mm225 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source105 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source73 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source140 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source22 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 g
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid, ChromeOS, iOS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons