Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 vs Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 1identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe has 105.1 mm more width than the GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 (174 mm vs 68.9 mm). The GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 67 mm more depth than the Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe (198 mm vs 131 mm). The GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 132 mm more package width than the Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe (306 mm vs 174 mm). Output interface: M.2 on the GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, Mini PCIe on the Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe. Product colour: Blue on the GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, Black on the Microconnect MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe.

  • Output interface
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:M.2
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:Mini PCIe
  • Product colour
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:Blue
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:Black
  • Width
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:68.9 mm
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:174 mm
  • Depth
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:198 mm
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:131 mm
  • Quantity per pack
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:6 pc(s)
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:1 pc(s)
  • Package width
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:306 mm
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:174 mm
  • Package depth
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:252 mm
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:131 mm
  • Package height
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:185 mm
    • MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L interface cards/adapter Internal Mini PCIe:34 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CMT3160, MC-PCIE-RS232-CH384L
23 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceKnown for onePCIeUnknown — not stated by the source
Output interfaceDiffersM.2Mini PCIe
Host interface genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card form factorKnown for oneLow-profileUnknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card standardKnown for onePCIe 4.0Unknown — not stated by the source
NVMeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of M.2 (M) slotsKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
InternalYesYes
Product colourDiffersBlueBlack
PurposeKnown for oneServerUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling typeKnown for onePassiveUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE
Featuresidentical
RAID levelsKnown for one0, 1, 10Unknown — not stated by the source
ChipsetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWCH CH384L
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers68.9 mm174 mm
DepthDiffers198 mm131 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source34 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 g
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per packDiffers6 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers306 mm174 mm
Package depthDiffers252 mm131 mm
Package heightDiffers185 mm34 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons