Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 vs InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 4identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232 has 33.1 mm more width than the GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 (102 mm vs 68.9 mm). The GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 196.3 mm more depth than the InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232 (198 mm vs 1.7 mm). The GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 166 mm more package width than the InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232 (306 mm vs 140 mm). Output interface: M.2 on the GIGABYTE CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, RS-232 on the InLine 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232.

  • Output interface
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:M.2
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:RS-232
  • Width
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:68.9 mm
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:102 mm
  • Depth
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:198 mm
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:1.7 mm
  • Package width
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:306 mm
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:140 mm
  • Package depth
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:252 mm
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:155 mm
  • Package height
    • CMT3160 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:185 mm
    • 76623E interface cards/adapter Internal RS-232:30 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CMT3160, 76623E
30 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfacePCIePCIe
Output interfaceDiffersM.2RS-232
Host interface genderMaleMale
Expansion card form factorLow-profileLow-profile
Expansion card standardKnown for onePCIe 4.0Unknown — not stated by the source
NVMeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of M.2 (M) slotsKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
InternalYesYes
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Product colourKnown for oneBlueUnknown — not stated by the source
PurposeKnown for oneServerUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling typeKnown for onePassiveUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
FIFO (First In, First Out)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source256 B
Data bitsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Flow control supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Parity bitKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEven, Odd, Mark, Space, No
RAID levelsKnown for one0, 1, 10Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows 11 x64
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKernel 2.6, Kernel 2.6.31, Kernel 2.6.33, Kernel 4.6.4
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers68.9 mm102 mm
DepthDiffers198 mm1.7 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers306 mm140 mm
Package depthDiffers252 mm155 mm
Package heightDiffers185 mm30 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source51 g
Quantity per packKnown for one6 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source102 x 1.7 x 120 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons