Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Fujitsu S26361-F3631-E1 interface cards/adapter Internal Fiber vs Fujitsu S26361-F4994-E201 interface cards/adapter Internal Fiber

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 6identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

  • Expansion card form factor
    • S26361-F3631-E1 interface cards/adapter Internal Fiber:Full-height / Full-length
    • S26361-F4994-E201 interface cards/adapter Internal Fiber:Low-profile
  • Expansion card standard
    • S26361-F3631-E1 interface cards/adapter Internal Fiber:PCIe 2.0
    • S26361-F4994-E201 interface cards/adapter Internal Fiber:PCIe 3.0
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • S26361-F3631-E1 interface cards/adapter Internal Fiber:5.5 W
    • S26361-F4994-E201 interface cards/adapter Internal Fiber:9.3 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of S26361-F3631-E1, S26361-F4994-E201
15 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfacePCIePCIe
Output interfaceFiberFiber
Expansion card form factorDiffersFull-height / Full-lengthLow-profile
Expansion card standardDiffersPCIe 2.0PCIe 3.0
Fiber optic connectorLCLC
Designidentical
InternalYesYes
PurposeServerServer
Cooling typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePassive
Hot-swapKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Hot-Plug supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs5.5 W9.3 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 55 °C0 - 55 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one8 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons