Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Epson UB-U03II vs Epson UB-U05

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 7identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

  • Package width
    • UB-U03II:85 mm
    • UB-U05:83 mm
  • Package depth
    • UB-U03II:104 mm
    • UB-U05:102 mm
  • Package height
    • UB-U03II:39 mm
    • UB-U05:37 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of UB-U03II, UB-U05
17 specifications
A

Epson

UB-U03II

Model UB-U03II

View product
B

Epson

UB-U05

Model UB-U05

View product
Ports & interfacesidentical
Output interfaceUSB 2.0USB 2.0
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Host interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB
Designidentical
InternalYesYes
Product colourKnown for oneBlack, Green, Stainless steelUnknown — not stated by the source
Country of originChinaChina
Packaging data3 differ
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers85 mm83 mm
Package depthDiffers104 mm102 mm
Package heightDiffers39 mm37 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) code8473302084733020
Products per pallet2400 pc(s)2400 pc(s)
Products per pallet layer120 pc(s)120 pc(s)
Pallet gross widthKnown for one80 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross lengthKnown for one120 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross heightKnown for one6.15 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEpson TM-H6000IV (014): Serial, w/o PS, ECW Epson TM-H6000IV (015): Serial, w/o PS, EDG Epson TM-H6000IV (023): Serial, w/o PS, ECW, MICR, E/P Epson TM-H6000IV (024): Serial, w/o PS, EDG, MICR, E/P Epson TM-H6000IV (033): Serial, w/o PS, ECW, MICR Epson TM-H6000IV (033A0): Powered USB, w/o PS, ECW,

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons