Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Cudy USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C vs Ugreen CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 1identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Cudy USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C has 2.498 Gbit/s more data transfer rate (max) than the Ugreen CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth (2.5 Gbit/s vs 0.002 Gbit/s). Host interface: USB Type-C on the Cudy USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C, USB Type-A on the Ugreen CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth. Output interface: RJ-45 on the Cudy USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C, Bluetooth on the Ugreen CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth. Product colour: Grey on the Cudy USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C, Black on the Ugreen CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth.

  • Host interface
    • USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C:USB Type-C
    • CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth:USB Type-A
  • Output interface
    • USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C:RJ-45
    • CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth:Bluetooth
  • Product colour
    • USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C:Grey
    • CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth:Black
  • Data transfer rate (max)
    • USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C:2.5 Gbit/s
    • CM591 interface cards/adapter Bluetooth:0.002 Gbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of USB-C to 2.5Gbps Ethernet Adapter | UE25C, CM591
31 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB Type-CUSB Type-A
Output interfaceDiffersRJ-45Bluetooth
Host interface genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersGreyBlack
PurposeKnown for onePC / Notebook / NASUnknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Connector 1 genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Connector 2 genderKnown for oneFemaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rate (max)Differs2.5 Gbit/s0.002 Gbit/s
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 75 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 100%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplier featuresidentical
Language versionKnown for oneMultilingualUnknown — not stated by the source
Manual languages (ISO 639 format)Known for oneMultiUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Plastic packaging weightKnown for one57.6 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Warranty periodKnown for one1 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one130 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one70 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWiredUnknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 11
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons