Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Cudy Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0 vs Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 1identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 333 mm more width than the Cudy Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0 (353 mm vs 20 mm). The Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 110.2 mm more depth than the Cudy Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0 (125.2 mm vs 15 mm). The Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 13.8 mm more height than the Cudy Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0 (21.8 mm vs 8 mm). Only the Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has internal. Host interface: USB Type-C on the Cudy Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0, PCIe on the Lenovo 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2.

  • Host interface
    • Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0:USB Type-C
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:PCIe
  • Output interface
    • Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0:Bluetooth
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:M.2
  • Internal
    • Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0:No
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:Yes
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0:0 - 40 °C
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:10 - 35 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0:10 - 90%
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:20 - 80%
  • Width
    • Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0:20 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:353 mm
  • Depth
    • Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0:15 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:125.2 mm
  • Height
    • Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0:8 mm
    • 4XH1S82999 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:21.8 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Bluetooth 5.3 USB-C Adapter, BU530C 1.0, 4XH1S82999
26 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB Type-CPCIe
Output interfaceDiffersBluetoothM.2
Host interface genderKnown for oneMaleUnknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth versionKnown for one5.3Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
InternalDiffersNoYes
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE EMC EU DoC FCC RCM DoC BSMI UK DoC VCCI KCC CB ECAC RoHS Morocco DoC
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C10 - 35 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-30 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%20 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Windows 11
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers20 mm353 mm
DepthDiffers15 mm125.2 mm
HeightDiffers8 mm21.8 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.8 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers58 mm500 mm
Package depthDiffers20 mm190 mm
Package heightDiffers91 mm75 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.37 kg
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons