Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Cudy Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0 vs InLine 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 2identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

  • Host interface
    • Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0:USB Type-A
    • 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):PCI
  • Output interface
    • Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0:Bluetooth
    • 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • Internal
    • Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0:No
    • 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):Yes
  • Product colour
    • Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0:Black
    • 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):Green, Silver
  • Width
    • Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0:222 mm
    • 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):120 mm
  • Depth
    • Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0:20 mm
    • 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):1.2 mm
  • Height
    • Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0:15 mm
    • 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):122 mm
  • Package width
    • Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0:80 mm
    • 76619M interface cards/adapter Internal USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):140 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Bluetooth 5.3 Long Range USB Adapter, BU530H 1.0, 76619M
31 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB Type-APCI
Output interfaceDiffersBluetoothUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Host interface genderMaleMale
Bluetooth versionKnown for one5.3Unknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePCIe 2.0
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Design2 differ
InternalDiffersNoYes
Product colourDiffersBlackGreen, Silver
PurposeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePC
Easy to installKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-30 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 11, Windows 10
Linux operating systems supportedYesYes
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers222 mm120 mm
DepthDiffers20 mm1.2 mm
HeightDiffers15 mm122 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers80 mm140 mm
Package depthDiffers22 mm150 mm
Package heightDiffers200 mm30 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source58 g
Package volumeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source600 cm³
Featuresidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 x 1.2 x 122 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons