Conceptronic EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen vs TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN)

Key differences

The Conceptronic EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen has 5 - 90% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN) (15 - 90% vs 10 - 90%). The Conceptronic EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen has 62.2 mm more width than the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN) (79 mm vs 16.8 mm). The Conceptronic EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen has 9 mm more depth than the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN) (51 mm vs 42 mm). Host interface: PCIe on the Conceptronic EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen, USB Type-A on the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN). Output interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C on the Conceptronic EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen, Bluetooth on the TP-Link UB500 PLUS(UN).

• Host interface
  • EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen:PCIe
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):USB Type-A
• Output interface
  • EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen:USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):Bluetooth
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen:0 - 85 °C
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):0 - 40 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen:15 - 90%
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):10 - 90%
• Width
  • EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen:79 mm
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):16.8 mm
• Depth
  • EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen:51 mm
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):42 mm
• Height
  • EMRICK14B 1-Port USB 3.2 Gen:30 mm
  • UB500 PLUS(UN):81 mm