Conceptronic EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter vs HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2

Key differences

The HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2 has 1.6 mm more width than the Conceptronic EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter (41.6 mm vs 40 mm). The Conceptronic EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter has 62.3 mm more depth than the HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2 (102 mm vs 39.7 mm). The Conceptronic EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter has 1.3 mm more height than the HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2 (18 mm vs 16.7 mm). Output interface: M.2 on the Conceptronic EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) on the HP Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2.

• Output interface
  • EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter:M.2
  • Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2)
• Width
  • EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter:40 mm
  • Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:41.6 mm
• Depth
  • EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter:102 mm
  • Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:39.7 mm
• Height
  • EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter:18 mm
  • Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:16.7 mm
• Weight
  • EMRICK M.2 NVMe SSD PCIe Adapter:42 g
  • Type-C USB 3.1 Gen2 Port Flex IO v2:10 g