Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Buffalo 2 Port USB 3.0 Express Interface Card vs Buffalo IFC-EC2U3UC interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 4identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • 2 Port USB 3.0 Express Interface Card:Black, Silver
    • IFC-EC2U3UC interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):Black, Grey
  • Data transfer rate
    • 2 Port USB 3.0 Express Interface Card:5 Gbit/s
    • IFC-EC2U3UC interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):5000 Mbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 2 Port USB 3.0 Express Interface Card, IFC-EC2U3UC
17 specifications
Ports & interfacesidentical
Output interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, SilverBlack, Grey
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one1.1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 35 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one20 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one41 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one116 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one15 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one31 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers5 Gbit/s5000 Mbit/s
Ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 7 (32, 64-bit), Vista (32, 64-bit), XPUnknown — not stated by the source
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceExpressCard 34/54

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons