Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Axagon ADX-X1 interface cards/adapter USB 2.0 vs Axagon ECA-S1 interface cards/adapter

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 5identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

  • Width
    • ADX-X1 interface cards/adapter USB 2.0:46 mm
    • ECA-S1 interface cards/adapter:117 mm
  • Depth
    • ADX-X1 interface cards/adapter USB 2.0:42 mm
    • ECA-S1 interface cards/adapter:44 mm
  • Height
    • ADX-X1 interface cards/adapter USB 2.0:15 mm
    • ECA-S1 interface cards/adapter:20 mm
  • Weight
    • ADX-X1 interface cards/adapter USB 2.0:41 g
    • ECA-S1 interface cards/adapter:20 g
  • Data transfer rate
    • ADX-X1 interface cards/adapter USB 2.0:480 Mbit/s
    • ECA-S1 interface cards/adapter:16 Mbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ADX-X1, ECA-S1
15 specifications
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceExpressCardExpressCard
Output interfaceKnown for oneUSB 2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-10 - 80 °C-10 - 80 °C
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty period3 year(s)3 year(s)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers46 mm117 mm
DepthDiffers42 mm44 mm
HeightDiffers15 mm20 mm
WeightDiffers41 g20 g
Other features2 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers480 Mbit/s16 Mbit/s
Ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Data link protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16C550, RS-232
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWired
Compatible operating systemsDiffersMS Windows XP/Vista/7/2003/2008/Linux 2.4.19+/MacOS 10.2.8+MS Windows XP/Vista/7/2003/2008/Linux 2.6.18.2+/MacOS 10.4/MS DOS 6.22
Mac compatibilityYesYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons