Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

ASUS NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232 vs Lenovo 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 2identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C has 10 - 35 °C more operating temperature (T-T) than the ASUS NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232 (10 - 35 °C vs 0 - 35 °C). The Lenovo 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C has 83 mm more width than the ASUS NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232 (126 mm vs 43 mm). The Lenovo 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C has 47.5 g more weight than the ASUS NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232 (68 g vs 20.5 g). Operating relative humidity (H-H): 0 - 92% on the ASUS NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232, 20 - 80% on the Lenovo 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C.

  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232:0 - 35 °C
    • 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C:10 - 35 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232:0 - 92%
    • 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C:20 - 80%
  • Width
    • NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232:43 mm
    • 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C:126 mm
  • Weight
    • NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232:20.5 g
    • 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C:68 g
  • Package width
    • NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232:105 mm
    • 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C:240 mm
  • Package depth
    • NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232:110 mm
    • 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C:145 mm
  • Package height
    • NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232:30 mm
    • 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C:52 mm
  • Package weight
    • NUCIOALA0CR interface cards/adapter RJ-45, RS-232:54.3 g
    • 4XH1U58035 interface cards/adapter Internal Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C:246 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of NUCIOALA0CR, 4XH1U58035
18 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Output interfaceDiffersRJ-45, RS-232Mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C
Host interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePCIe
Featuresidentical
Data transfer rate (max)Known for one2.5 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 35 °C10 - 35 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 92%20 - 80%
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers43 mm126 mm
DepthKnown for one88 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers20.5 g68 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers105 mm240 mm
Package depthDiffers110 mm145 mm
Package heightDiffers30 mm52 mm
Package weightDiffers54.3 g246 g
Designidentical
InternalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBSMI EMC test report and DoC FCC sDoC ICES-003 CE EMC report and EU DoC UK DOC VCCI KCC (EMC) RCM EMC CB EQM or ECAS ROHS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons