Product comparison · 2 inkjet printers

Epson WF-C529RDTW BAM vs Epson WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour

Add a product
  • 41specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 24identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour has 25,000 pages per month more maximum duty cycle than the Epson WF-C529RDTW BAM (75000 pages per month vs 50000 pages per month). The Epson WF-C529RDTW BAM has 1 more total input trays than the Epson WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour (2 vs 1). The Epson WF-C529RDTW BAM has 500 sheets more total input capacity than the Epson WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour (830 sheets vs 330 sheets). Paper tray media types: Envelopes, Plain paper on the Epson WF-C529RDTW BAM, Photo paper, Plain paper on the Epson WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour. Envelopes sizes: 10, C4, C6, DL on the Epson WF-C529RDTW BAM, 10, C4, C5, C6, DL on the Epson WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour.

  • Maximum duty cycle
    • WF-C529RDTW BAM:50000 pages per month
    • WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour:75000 pages per month
  • Total number of input trays
    • WF-C529RDTW BAM:2
    • WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour:1
  • Total input capacity
    • WF-C529RDTW BAM:830 sheets
    • WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour:330 sheets
  • Maximum input capacity
    • WF-C529RDTW BAM:1330 sheets
    • WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour:1830 sheets
  • Paper tray media types
    • WF-C529RDTW BAM:Envelopes, Plain paper
    • WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour:Photo paper, Plain paper
  • Envelopes sizes
    • WF-C529RDTW BAM:10, C4, C6, DL
    • WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour:10, C4, C5, C6, DL
  • Photo paper sizes
    • WF-C529RDTW BAM:9x13,10x15,13x18
    • WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour:10x15,13x18 cm
  • Paper tray media weight
    • WF-C529RDTW BAM:64 - 300 g/m²
    • WorkForce Pro WF-C5390DW inkjet printer Colour:64 - 256 g/m²

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of WF-C529RDTW BAM, WF-C5390DW
60 specifications
Features1 differ
ColourYesYes
Maximum duty cycleDiffers50000 pages per month75000 pages per month
Duplex printingYesYes
Duplex printing modeAutoAuto
Page description languagesESC/P-R, PCL 5c, PCL 6, PDF 1.7, PostScript 3ESC/P-R, PCL 5c, PCL 6, PDF 1.7, PostScript 3
Printing coloursBlack, Cyan, Magenta, YellowBlack, Cyan, Magenta, Yellow
Number of print cartridgesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Printingidentical
Maximum resolution4800 x 1200 DPI4800 x 1200 DPI
Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)34 ppm34 ppm
Print speed (colour, draft quality, A4/US Letter)Known for one34 ppmUnknown — not stated by the source
Time to first page (black, normal)4.8 s4.8 s
Time to first page (colour, normal)5.3 s5.3 s
Print speed (colour, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source34 ppm
Input & output capacity3 differ
Total number of input traysDiffers21
Total input capacityDiffers830 sheets330 sheets
Total output capacity150 sheets150 sheets
Maximum input capacityDiffers1330 sheets1830 sheets
Maximum number of input traysKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
Paper handling4 differ
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeA4A4
Paper tray media typesDiffersEnvelopes, Plain paperPhoto paper, Plain paper
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)A4, A5, A6A4, A5, A6
ISO B-series sizes (B0...B9)Known for oneB5, B6Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-ISO print media sizesLegal, LetterLegal, Letter
Envelopes sizesDiffers10, C4, C6, DL10, C4, C5, C6, DL
Photo paper sizesDiffers9x13,10x15,13x1810x15,13x18 cm
Paper tray media weightDiffers64 - 300 g/m²64 - 256 g/m²
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB portYesYes
Direct printingYesYes
Network2 differ
Ethernet LANYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
Wi-Fi DirectYesYes
Security algorithmsDiffers64-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-AES, WPA2-Enterprise, WPA2-PSK64-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP, WPA-AES, WPA-PSK, WPA2-AES, WPA2-PSK
Mobile printing technologiesDiffersApple AirPrint, Epson Email Print, Epson Remote Print, Epson iPrint, Google Cloud PrintApple AirPrint, Epson Email Print, Epson Remote Print, Google Cloud Print
Performanceidentical
Sound pressure level (printing)Known for one54 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound power level (printing)Known for one6.9 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2057 MB
Design2 differ
Market positioningDiffersHome & officeBusiness
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack, White
Built-in displayYesYes
Colour displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonalKnown for one6.1 cm (2.4")Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for oneIndonesiaUnknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power consumption (printing)Differs24 W25 W
Power consumption (off)0.2 W0.2 W
Power consumption (ready)Differs8 W9.8 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one1.2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy Star Typical Electricity Consumption (TEC)Differs0.18 kWh/week0.17 kWh/week
AC input voltage220 - 240 V220 - 240 V
AC input frequency50 - 60 Hz50 - 60 Hz
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Width425 mm425 mm
Depth535 mm535 mm
HeightDiffers513 mm357 mm
WeightDiffers23.9 kg15.3 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one586 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one628 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one860 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one31 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More inkjet printer comparisons

All inkjet printer comparisons