Product comparison · 2 ice cream makers

MEDION LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090 vs Unold 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 3identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

The MEDION LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090 has 237 mm more depth than the Unold 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia (429 mm vs 192 mm). The MEDION LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090 has 35 mm more height than the Unold 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia (446 mm vs 411 mm). The MEDION LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090 has 2.5 kg more weight than the Unold 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia (11.7 kg vs 9.2 kg).

  • Depth
    • LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090:429 mm
    • 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia:192 mm
  • Height
    • LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090:446 mm
    • 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia:411 mm
  • Weight
    • LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090:11.7 kg
    • 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia:9.2 kg
  • Width
    • LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090:175 mm
    • 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia:415 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of LIFE Slush-Eismaschine MD12090, 48965 2in1-Slush und Softeismaschine Sofia
38 specifications
Featuresidentical
Product typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSoft serve ice cream maker
Sorbet makingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Slushie makingYesYes
Cold drink makingYesYes
Milkshake makingYesYes
Frappe makingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 m
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Bowl capacityKnown for one2.6 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of bowlsKnown for one1 bowlsUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for oneGreyUnknown — not stated by the source
Preparation timeKnown for one60 minUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for oneButtons, RotaryUnknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Removable bowlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers429 mm192 mm
HeightDiffers446 mm411 mm
WeightDiffers11.7 kg9.2 kg
WidthDiffers175 mm415 mm
Poweridentical
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 W
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220-240 V
Certificatesidentical
Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) complianceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Logistics dataidentical
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Products per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18 pc(s)
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84186900
Pallet gross heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source170 cm
Pallet gross lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 cm
Pallet gross widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 cm
Shipping (inner) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source49.9 cm
Shipping (inner) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48.5 cm
Shipping (inner) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source26 cm
Products per pallet layerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 pc(s)
Layers per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 pc(s)
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12.2 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneR600aUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ice cream maker comparisons

All ice cream maker comparisons