Product comparison · 2 home cinema systems

Philips DCP951/37 home cinema system vs Philips HTS8140/37 home cinema system

Add a product
  • 3specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 0identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips HTS8140/37 home cinema system has 7.8 kg more weight than the Philips DCP951/37 home cinema system (8.9 kg vs 1.1 kg). MP3 bit rates: 32 - 320 Kbit/s on the Philips DCP951/37 home cinema system, 32 - 256 Kbit/s on the Philips HTS8140/37 home cinema system. Package dimensions (WxDxH): 274 x 84 x 290 mm on the Philips DCP951/37 home cinema system, 1120 x 598 x 388 mm on the Philips HTS8140/37 home cinema system.

  • MP3 bit rates
    • DCP951/37 home cinema system:32 - 320 Kbit/s
    • HTS8140/37 home cinema system:32 - 256 Kbit/s
  • Package dimensions (WxDxH)
    • DCP951/37 home cinema system:274 x 84 x 290 mm
    • HTS8140/37 home cinema system:1120 x 598 x 388 mm
  • Weight
    • DCP951/37 home cinema system:1.1 kg
    • HTS8140/37 home cinema system:8.9 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DCP951/37, HTS8140/37
34 specifications
Audio1 differ
MP3 bit ratesDiffers32 - 320 Kbit/s32 - 256 Kbit/s
Radioidentical
Supported radio bandsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFM
Satellite speakersidentical
Satellite speaker impedanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 Ω
Subwooferidentical
Subwoofer typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceActive subwoofer
Subwoofer driver diameter (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.54 cm (1")
Subwoofer frequency rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source35 - 200 Hz
Subwoofer impedanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 Ω
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Poweridentical
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.3 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Subwoofer dimensions (W x D x H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source322 x 322 x 425 mm
Subwoofer weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12.7 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1120 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source598 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source388 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 kg
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs274 x 84 x 290 mm1120 x 598 x 388 mm
Other features1 differ
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source154 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source174 mm
Image formats supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceJPEG
WeightDiffers1.1 kg8.9 kg
Set weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.9 kg
Set widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source104.7 cm
Battery charge indicatorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display brightnessKnown for one200 cd/m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Effective viewing areaKnown for one202.6 x 105.3 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.11 x 0.48 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Displayidentical
Display diagonalKnown for one22.9 cm (9")Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one640 x 220 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Response timeKnown for one30 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Case or master carton dimensions (W x D x H)Known for one262 x 284 x 305 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Case or master carton quantityKnown for one3 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Case or master carton weightKnown for one4.7 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one4.7 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More home cinema system comparisons

All home cinema system comparisons