Product comparison · 2 home audio systems

Kenwood M-7000S Home audio mini system vs Kenwood M-9000S Home audio mini system

Add a product
  • 60specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 49identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • RMS rated power
    • M-7000S Home audio mini system:30 W
    • M-9000S Home audio mini system:50 W
  • Audio formats supported
    • M-7000S Home audio mini system:CBR, MP3, MP3 VBR
    • M-9000S Home audio mini system:MP3, MP3 VBR, CBR
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • M-7000S Home audio mini system:25 W
    • M-9000S Home audio mini system:49 W
  • Front speaker width
    • M-7000S Home audio mini system:13.5 cm
    • M-9000S Home audio mini system:17.3 cm
  • Front speaker depth
    • M-7000S Home audio mini system:22 cm
    • M-9000S Home audio mini system:24 cm
  • Front speaker height
    • M-7000S Home audio mini system:20 cm
    • M-9000S Home audio mini system:26.3 cm
  • Main unit dimensions (WxDxH)
    • M-7000S Home audio mini system:200 x 260 x 115 mm
    • M-9000S Home audio mini system:260 x 260 x 115 mm
  • Package width
    • M-7000S Home audio mini system:500 mm
    • M-9000S Home audio mini system:530 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of M-7000S, M-9000S
60 specifications
Multimedia1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers30 W50 W
Performance1 differ
Audio formats supportedDiffersCBR, MP3, MP3 VBRMP3, MP3 VBR, CBR
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs25 W49 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Front speaker widthDiffers13.5 cm17.3 cm
Front speaker depthDiffers22 cm24 cm
Front speaker heightDiffers20 cm26.3 cm
Main unit dimensions (WxDxH)Differs200 x 260 x 115 mm260 x 260 x 115 mm
Package widthDiffers500 mm530 mm
Package depthDiffers300 mm350 mm
Package heightDiffers300 mm330 mm
Package weightDiffers6 kg5.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More home audio system comparisons

All home audio system comparisons