Product comparison · 2 home audio systems

JVC CD Micro Component System vs Philips Streamium WAC3500D/37 home audio system

3specifications compared
2differ
1identical
39known for one product only

Key differences

Weight
- CD Micro Component System:2.6 kg
- Streamium WAC3500D/37 home audio system:9 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- CD Micro Component System:141 x 211 x 216 mm
- Streamium WAC3500D/37 home audio system:505 x 280 x 220 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CD Micro Component System, WAC3500D/37
42 specifications	A JVC CD Micro Component System View product	B Philips Streamium WAC3500D/37 home audio system Model WAC3500D/37 View product
Designidentical
TypeKnown for one	Home audio micro system	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Silver	Unknown — not stated by the source
Optical disc playerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cassette deckKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cassette deck technologyKnown for one	Full Logical	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of optical discsKnown for one	1 discs	Unknown — not stated by the source
Disc loading typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Tray
Multimediaidentical
ImpedanceKnown for one	4 Ω	Unknown — not stated by the source
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)Known for one	60 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)Known for one	10%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Radioidentical
Radio Data System (RDS)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported radio bandsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FM
Displayidentical
Display type	LCD	LCD
Backlight displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Backlight colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	White
BacklightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ID3 Tag displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
Headphone outputsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
MP3 playbackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recording onKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HDD
Channels quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 channels
Ergonomicsidentical
EqualizerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Equalizer bands quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bass adjustmentKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Treble adjustmentKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	2.6 kg	9 kg
Case or master carton weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.23 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Speaker widthKnown for one	13.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Speaker depthKnown for one	21.2 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Speaker heightKnown for one	17.8 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
CD-R playbackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	141 x 211 x 216 mm	505 x 280 x 220 mm
Media types supportedKnown for one	CD / CD-R/RW / MP3 / WMA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 MB
Auto digital tuningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
MP3 bit ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32 - 320 Kbit/s
WMA bit ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16 - 128 Kbit/s
Auto storeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Set weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9 kg
Storageidentical
Total storage capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 GB
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.23 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More home audio system comparisons

All home audio system comparisons