Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool AKM526 NA/C vs Whirlpool AKT 466

33specifications compared
8differ
25identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

Cooking zone 1 power
- AKM526 NA/C:1650 W
- AKT 466:1750 W
Cooking zone 2 type
- AKM526 NA/C:Regular
- AKT 466:Large
Cooking zone 2 power
- AKM526 NA/C:1650 W
- AKT 466:3500 W
Cooking zone 3 type
- AKM526 NA/C:Large
- AKT 466:Regular
Cooking zone 3 power
- AKM526 NA/C:3000 W
- AKT 466:1750 W
Large cooking zone
- AKM526 NA/C:3000 W
- AKT 466:3700 W
Width
- AKM526 NA/C:590 mm
- AKT 466:730 mm
Height
- AKM526 NA/C:41 mm
- AKT 466:49 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AKM526 NA/C, AKT 466
37 specifications	A Whirlpool AKM526 NA/C View product	B Whirlpool AKT 466 View product
Design5 differ
Top surface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Glass
Cooking zone 1 powerDiffers	1650 W	1750 W
Cooking zone 2 typeDiffers	Regular	Large
Cooking zone 2 powerDiffers	1650 W	3500 W
Cooking zone 3 typeDiffers	Large	Regular
Cooking zone 3 powerDiffers	3000 W	1750 W
Wok burnerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wok burner positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Left front
Wok burner powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3500 W
Performance1 differ
Large cooking zoneDiffers	3000 W	3700 W
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	590 mm	730 mm
HeightDiffers	41 mm	49 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons