Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool AKM 528 NA/C vs Whirlpool AKR 350/IX

Key differences

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AKM 528 NA/C, AKR 350/IX
44 specifications	A Whirlpool AKM 528 NA/C View product	B Whirlpool AKR 350/IX View product
Design3 differ
Product colourDiffers	Anthracite	Stainless steel
Top surface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stainless steel
Cooking zone 1 powerDiffers	1650 W	1750 W
Cooking zone 2 powerDiffers	1650 W	1750 W
Performanceidentical
Regular cooking zoneKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1750 W
Thermocouple protectionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Control positionDiffers	Front	Top front
Easy to cleanKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Electronic ignitionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flame failure deviceKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 Hz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthDiffers	590 mm	580 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	510 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.7 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	660 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	590 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	170 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8.3 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.