Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 826/NE/IXL vs Whirlpool ACM 866/BF

Key differences

Number of cooking zones
- ACM 826/NE/IXL:4 zone(s)
- ACM 866/BF:3 zone(s)
Number of electric cooking zones
- ACM 826/NE/IXL:4 zone(s)
- ACM 866/BF:3 zone(s)
Connected load (electric)
- ACM 826/NE/IXL:7200 W
- ACM 866/BF:7000 W
Current
- ACM 826/NE/IXL:31.3 A
- ACM 866/BF:30.4 A
Width
- ACM 826/NE/IXL:580 mm
- ACM 866/BF:650 mm
Weight
- ACM 826/NE/IXL:12.5 kg
- ACM 866/BF:13.3 kg
Package width
- ACM 826/NE/IXL:670 mm
- ACM 866/BF:865 mm
Package depth
- ACM 826/NE/IXL:590 mm
- ACM 866/BF:605 mm

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACM 826/NE/IXL, ACM 866/BF
31 specifications	A Whirlpool ACM 826/NE/IXL View product	B Whirlpool ACM 866/BF View product
Design2 differ
Number of cooking zonesDiffers	4 zone(s)	3 zone(s)
Number of electric cooking zonesDiffers	4 zone(s)	3 zone(s)
Performanceidentical
Boost functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Connected load (electric)Differs	7200 W	7000 W
CurrentDiffers	31.3 A	30.4 A
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	580 mm	650 mm
WeightDiffers	12.5 kg	13.3 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers	670 mm	865 mm
Package depthDiffers	590 mm	605 mm
Package weightDiffers	13.5 kg	14.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.