Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 756/NE vs Whirlpool ACM 816/BA

Key differences

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACM 756/NE, ACM 816/BA
48 specifications	A Whirlpool ACM 756/NE View product	B Whirlpool ACM 816/BA View product
Design5 differ
Cooking zone 1 typeDiffers	Regular	Simmer
Cooking zone 2 diameterDiffers	210 mm	180 mm
Cooking zone 3 shapeDiffers	Round	Rectangular
Cooking zone 4 typeDiffers	Large	Regular
Cooking zone 4 shapeDiffers	Round	Rectangular
Cooking zone 3 diameterKnown for one	145 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 4 diameterKnown for one	180 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Frame typeKnown for one	Frameless	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Easy to cleanKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Child lockKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Connected load (electric)Differs	6500 W	7200 W
CurrentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	31.3 A
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Installation compartment widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 cm
Installation compartment depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	49 cm
Cord lengthKnown for one	1.5 m	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.