Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 434/IX/S/G vs Whirlpool ACM 435/IX/F/G

28specifications compared
2differ
26identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The Whirlpool ACM 434/IX/S/G has 1.5 cm more regular cooking zone diameter than the Whirlpool ACM 435/IX/F/G (14.5 cm vs 13 cm). The Whirlpool ACM 435/IX/F/G has 2,200 W more regular cooking zone than the Whirlpool ACM 434/IX/S/G (3700 W vs 1500 W).

Regular cooking zone diameter
- ACM 434/IX/S/G:14.5 cm
- ACM 435/IX/F/G:13 cm
Regular cooking zone
- ACM 434/IX/S/G:1500 W
- ACM 435/IX/F/G:3700 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACM 434/IX/S/G, ACM 435/IX/F/G
28 specifications	A Whirlpool ACM 434/IX/S/G View product	B Whirlpool ACM 435/IX/F/G View product
Design1 differ
Regular cooking zone diameterDiffers	14.5 cm	13 cm
Performance1 differ
Regular cooking zoneDiffers	1500 W	3700 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons