Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S vs Whirlpool AKM 295/IX

Key differences

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACM 426/IX/S, AKM 295/IX
29 specifications	A Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S View product	B Whirlpool AKM 295/IX View product
Design3 differ
Product colour	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Appliance placement	Built-in	Built-in
Hob type	Gas	Gas
Top surface type	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Number of cooking zonesDiffers	1 zone(s)	3 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zonesDiffers	1 zone(s)	3 zone(s)
Number of electric cooking zones	0 zone(s)	0 zone(s)
Cooking zone 1 typeKnown for one	Regular	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 1 positionKnown for one	Central	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 1 power sourceKnown for one	Gas	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 1 shapeKnown for one	Round	Unknown — not stated by the source
Regular cooking zone diameterDiffers	13 cm	7.5 cm
Pan support materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cast iron
Performance1 differ
Regular cooking zoneDiffers	3700 W	1650 W
Large cooking zoneKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3700 W
Ergonomicsidentical
Control type	Rotary	Rotary
Control position	Top right	Top right
Electronic ignition	Yes	Yes
Residual heat indicator	No	No
Poweridentical
AC input frequency	50 Hz	50 Hz
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	400 mm	900 mm
DepthDiffers	400 mm	380 mm
Height	80 mm	80 mm
Weight	20 kg	20 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers	485 mm	1240 mm
Package depthDiffers	485 mm	400 mm
Package heightDiffers	185 mm	240 mm
Package weight	23 kg	23 kg
Other featuresidentical
Display	No	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.