Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S vs Whirlpool ACM 438/IX/S/G

23specifications compared
10differ
13identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

Number of cooking zones
- ACM 426/IX/S:1 zone(s)
- ACM 438/IX/S/G:3 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zones
- ACM 426/IX/S:1 zone(s)
- ACM 438/IX/S/G:3 zone(s)
Regular cooking zone diameter
- ACM 426/IX/S:13 cm
- ACM 438/IX/S/G:7.5 cm
Regular cooking zone
- ACM 426/IX/S:3700 W
- ACM 438/IX/S/G:1650 W
Width
- ACM 426/IX/S:400 mm
- ACM 438/IX/S/G:1200 mm
Weight
- ACM 426/IX/S:20 kg
- ACM 438/IX/S/G:23 kg
Package width
- ACM 426/IX/S:485 mm
- ACM 438/IX/S/G:1235 mm
Package depth
- ACM 426/IX/S:485 mm
- ACM 438/IX/S/G:395 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACM 426/IX/S, ACM 438/IX/S/G
28 specifications	A Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S View product	B Whirlpool ACM 438/IX/S/G View product
Design3 differ
Number of cooking zonesDiffers	1 zone(s)	3 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zonesDiffers	1 zone(s)	3 zone(s)
Cooking zone 1 typeKnown for one	Regular	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 1 positionKnown for one	Central	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 1 power sourceKnown for one	Gas	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooking zone 1 shapeKnown for one	Round	Unknown — not stated by the source
Regular cooking zone diameterDiffers	13 cm	7.5 cm
Pan support materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cast iron
Performance1 differ
Regular cooking zoneDiffers	3700 W	1650 W
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	400 mm	1200 mm
WeightDiffers	20 kg	23 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	485 mm	1235 mm
Package depthDiffers	485 mm	395 mm
Package heightDiffers	185 mm	220 mm
Package weightDiffers	23 kg	25 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons