Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 422/IX/F vs Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S

Add a product
  • 27specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 25identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

The Whirlpool ACM 422/IX/F has 1.5 cm more regular cooking zone diameter than the Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S (14.5 cm vs 13 cm). The Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S has 2,200 W more regular cooking zone than the Whirlpool ACM 422/IX/F (3700 W vs 1500 W).

  • Regular cooking zone diameter
    • ACM 422/IX/F:14.5 cm
    • ACM 426/IX/S:13 cm
  • Regular cooking zone
    • ACM 422/IX/F:1500 W
    • ACM 426/IX/S:3700 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ACM 422/IX/F, ACM 426/IX/S
27 specifications
Design1 differ
Regular cooking zone diameterDiffers14.5 cm13 cm
Performance1 differ
Regular cooking zoneDiffers1500 W3700 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons