Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F vs Whirlpool ACM 436/IX/S/G

28specifications compared
2differ
26identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The Whirlpool ACM 436/IX/S/G has 5.5 cm more regular cooking zone diameter than the Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F (13 cm vs 7.5 cm). The Whirlpool ACM 436/IX/S/G has 2,050 W more regular cooking zone than the Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F (3700 W vs 1650 W).

Regular cooking zone diameter
- ACM 420/IX/F:7.5 cm
- ACM 436/IX/S/G:13 cm
Regular cooking zone
- ACM 420/IX/F:1650 W
- ACM 436/IX/S/G:3700 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACM 420/IX/F, ACM 436/IX/S/G
28 specifications	A Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F View product	B Whirlpool ACM 436/IX/S/G View product
Design1 differ
Regular cooking zone diameterDiffers	7.5 cm	13 cm
Performance1 differ
Regular cooking zoneDiffers	1650 W	3700 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons