Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F vs Whirlpool ACM 429/IX/F/G

28specifications compared
2differ
26identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F has 3 cm more regular cooking zone diameter than the Whirlpool ACM 429/IX/F/G (7.5 cm vs 4.5 cm). The Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F has 650 W more regular cooking zone than the Whirlpool ACM 429/IX/F/G (1650 W vs 1000 W).

Regular cooking zone diameter
- ACM 420/IX/F:7.5 cm
- ACM 429/IX/F/G:4.5 cm
Regular cooking zone
- ACM 420/IX/F:1650 W
- ACM 429/IX/F/G:1000 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACM 420/IX/F, ACM 429/IX/F/G
28 specifications	A Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F View product	B Whirlpool ACM 429/IX/F/G View product
Design1 differ
Regular cooking zone diameterDiffers	7.5 cm	4.5 cm
Performance1 differ
Regular cooking zoneDiffers	1650 W	1000 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons