Product comparison · 2 hobs

Electrolux EHGT 320 CX vs Hotpoint PO 740 ES (IX)/HA

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The Hotpoint PO 740 ES (IX)/HA has 3,800 W more power than the Electrolux EHGT 320 CX (7800 W vs 4000 W). The Hotpoint PO 740 ES (IX)/HA has 410 mm more width than the Electrolux EHGT 320 CX (700 mm vs 290 mm). The Hotpoint PO 740 ES (IX)/HA has 10 mm more height than the Electrolux EHGT 320 CX (40 mm vs 30 mm). Product colour: White on the Electrolux EHGT 320 CX, Silver on the Hotpoint PO 740 ES (IX)/HA. Number of cooking zones: 1 zone(s) on the Electrolux EHGT 320 CX, 4 zone(s) on the Hotpoint PO 740 ES (IX)/HA.

Product colour
- EHGT 320 CX:White
- PO 740 ES (IX)/HA:Silver
Number of cooking zones
- EHGT 320 CX:1 zone(s)
- PO 740 ES (IX)/HA:4 zone(s)
Power
- EHGT 320 CX:4000 W
- PO 740 ES (IX)/HA:7800 W
Width
- EHGT 320 CX:290 mm
- PO 740 ES (IX)/HA:700 mm
Height
- EHGT 320 CX:30 mm
- PO 740 ES (IX)/HA:40 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EHGT 320 CX, PO 740 ES (IX)/HA
36 specifications	A Electrolux EHGT 320 CX View product	B Hotpoint PO 740 ES (IX)/HA View product
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Silver
Number of cooking zonesDiffers	1 zone(s)	4 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zonesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 zone(s)
Number of electric cooking zonesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 zone(s)
Cooking zone 1 typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Large
Cooking zone 1 positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Left front
Cooking zone 1 powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3000 W
Cooking zone 1 power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gas
Cooking zone 1 shapeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rectangular
Cooking zone 1 size (W x D)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90 x 90 mm
Cooking zone 2 typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Simmer
Cooking zone 2 positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Middle rear
Cooking zone 2 power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gas
Cooking zone 2 shapeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rectangular
Cooking zone 2 size (W x D)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 x 45 mm
Cooking zone 2 powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000 W
Cooking zone 3 typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Regular
Cooking zone 3 positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Right
Cooking zone 3 power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gas
Cooking zone 3 shapeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Round
Cooking zone 3 powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1900 W
Cooking zone 3 size (W x D)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 x 65 mm
Cooking zone 4 typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Regular
Cooking zone 4 positionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Middle front
Cooking zone 4 power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gas
Cooking zone 4 shapeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rectangular
Cooking zone 4 size (W x D)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 x 65 mm
Cooking zone 4 powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1900 W
Ergonomicsidentical
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rotary
Electronic ignitionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	4000 W	7800 W
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	290 mm	700 mm
HeightDiffers	30 mm	40 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons