Product comparison · 2 head-mounted displays

LG 360 VR vs Samsung SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display has 232 g more weight than the LG 360 VR (345 g vs 113 g). The Samsung SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display has 43 mm more width than the LG 360 VR (207.1 mm vs 164.1 mm). The LG 360 VR has 64.8 mm more depth than the Samsung SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display (185.5 mm vs 120.7 mm). Type: Dedicated head mounted display on the LG 360 VR, Smartphone-based head mounted display on the Samsung SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display.

Weight
- 360 VR:113 g
- SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display:345 g
Width
- 360 VR:164.1 mm
- SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display:207.1 mm
Depth
- 360 VR:185.5 mm
- SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display:120.7 mm
Height
- 360 VR:45.9 mm
- SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display:98.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 360 VR, SM-R325NZVAATO
18 specifications	A LG 360 VR View product	B Samsung SM-R325NZVAATO head-mounted display Smartphone-based head mounted display Model SM-R325NZVAATO View product
Features1 differ
TypeDiffers	Dedicated head mounted display	Smartphone-based head mounted display
Product colour	Grey	Grey
Viewing angleKnown for one	80°	Unknown — not stated by the source
ColorationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Monochromatic
Field of view (FOV) angleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	101°
Sensorsidentical
Proximity sensor	Yes	Yes
Accelerometer	Yes	Yes
GyroscopeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB connector typeKnown for one	USB Type-A, USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Card reader integratedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Minimum screen sizeKnown for one	4.78 cm (1.88")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WeightDiffers	113 g	345 g
WidthDiffers	164.1 mm	207.1 mm
DepthDiffers	185.5 mm	120.7 mm
HeightDiffers	45.9 mm	98.6 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Cleaning clothKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More head-mounted display comparisons

All head-mounted display comparisons