Product comparison · 2 head-mounted displays

LG 360 VR vs Samsung SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display

10specifications compared
6differ
4identical
9known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display has 232 g more weight than the LG 360 VR (345 g vs 113 g). The Samsung SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display has 43 mm more width than the LG 360 VR (207.1 mm vs 164.1 mm). The LG 360 VR has 64.8 mm more depth than the Samsung SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display (185.5 mm vs 120.7 mm). Type: Dedicated head mounted display on the LG 360 VR, Smartphone-based head mounted display on the Samsung SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display. USB connector type: USB Type-A, USB Type-C on the LG 360 VR, Micro-USB, USB Type-C on the Samsung SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display.

USB connector type
- 360 VR:USB Type-A, USB Type-C
- SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display:Micro-USB, USB Type-C
Weight
- 360 VR:113 g
- SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display:345 g
Width
- 360 VR:164.1 mm
- SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display:207.1 mm
Depth
- 360 VR:185.5 mm
- SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display:120.7 mm
Height
- 360 VR:45.9 mm
- SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display:98.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 360 VR, SM-R325
19 specifications	A LG 360 VR View product	B Samsung SM-R325 Smartphone-based head mounted display Model SM-R325 View product
Features1 differ
TypeDiffers	Dedicated head mounted display	Smartphone-based head mounted display
Product colour	Grey	Grey
Viewing angleKnown for one	80°	Unknown — not stated by the source
ColorationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Monochromatic
Field of view (FOV) angleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	101°
Brand compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Samsung
Sensorsidentical
Proximity sensor	Yes	Yes
Accelerometer	Yes	Yes
Gyroscope	Yes	Yes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB connector typeDiffers	USB Type-A, USB Type-C	Micro-USB, USB Type-C
USB versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Card reader integratedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Minimum screen sizeKnown for one	4.78 cm (1.88")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WeightDiffers	113 g	345 g
WidthDiffers	164.1 mm	207.1 mm
DepthDiffers	185.5 mm	120.7 mm
HeightDiffers	45.9 mm	98.6 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Cleaning clothKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More head-mounted display comparisons

All head-mounted display comparisons