Product comparison · 2 head-mounted displays

Acer AH100 Dedicated head mounted display vs Samsung SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display

10specifications compared
5differ
5identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display has 6° more viewing angle than the Acer AH100 Dedicated head mounted display (101° vs 95°). The Acer AH100 Dedicated head mounted display has 5 g more weight than the Samsung SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display (350 g vs 345 g). Type: Dedicated head mounted display on the Acer AH100 Dedicated head mounted display, Smartphone-based head mounted display on the Samsung SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display. Control type: Buttons on the Acer AH100 Dedicated head mounted display, Buttons, Touch on the Samsung SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display. USB connector type: USB Type-A on the Acer AH100 Dedicated head mounted display, Micro-USB, USB Type-C on the Samsung SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display.

Viewing angle
- AH100 Dedicated head mounted display:95°
- SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display:101°
Control type
- AH100 Dedicated head mounted display:Buttons
- SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display:Buttons, Touch
USB connector type
- AH100 Dedicated head mounted display:USB Type-A
- SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display:Micro-USB, USB Type-C
Weight
- AH100 Dedicated head mounted display:350 g
- SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display:345 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AH100, SM-R323
30 specifications	A Acer AH100 Dedicated head mounted display Model AH100 View product	B Samsung SM-R323 Smartphone-based head mounted display Model SM-R323 View product
Features3 differ
TypeDiffers	Dedicated head mounted display	Smartphone-based head mounted display
Viewing angleDiffers	95°	101°
Field of view (FOV) angleKnown for one	95°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one	90 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeDiffers	Buttons	Buttons, Touch
ColorationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Monochromatic
Volume controlKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Digital
Displayidentical
Display resolutionKnown for one	2880 x 1440 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sensorsidentical
Magnetic sensorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB connector typeDiffers	USB Type-A	Micro-USB, USB Type-C
USB versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for one	Battery, DC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input deviceidentical
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wired	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum RAMKnown for one	8 GB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum storage drive spaceKnown for one	10 GB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum processorKnown for one	Intel Core i3 Dual-Core / AMD FX4350 Quad-Core	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum graphics cardKnown for one	nVidia GeForce GTX 960 / AMD Radeon RX 460	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	350 g	345 g
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	207 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	122 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	98.5 mm
Packaging contentidentical
User guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More head-mounted display comparisons

All head-mounted display comparisons